User talk:Redstar1987

[1] is obvious vandalism, possibly motivated by POV-pushing. I'm going to revert it. You shouldn't vandalise again. Digwuren 15:02, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

RESPONSE TO Digwuren BY Redstar1987:

Your reverting is vandalism! Keep a neutral point of view!

The article Socialism is Good has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article seemed to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.

Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. NawlinWiki 15:41, 9 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The entire content of your article was "'Socialism is Good' is a chinese revolutionary song", followed by the lyrics. There was no indication in the article that the song was famous or notable. If you can assert the song's notability, supported by reliable sources, feel free to repost. NawlinWiki 20:46, 9 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

List of socialist flash animations

I have deleted that article because it consisted essentially of external links. I really see no way to turn this article into anything other than such a haphazard list: very few if any of these flash animations have any sort of notability and they have little in common. Pascal.Tesson 15:51, 24 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've submitted the page to articles for deletion where I am confident all with agree with my assessment. Please remember that Wikipedia is not a free provider of webspace or an internet guide. Pascal.Tesson 16:21, 24 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

List of Socialist Flash Animation

A tag has been placed on List of Socialist Flash Animation, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

This was just deleted

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet very basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Jimmi Hugh 16:11, 24 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of List of socialist countries

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is List of socialist countries. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of socialist countries (3rd nomination). Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:17, 19 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]